MICROTEK LABS SCANMAKER X12 DRIVER DOWNLOAD
You may unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time. Microtek’s X12USL is a good choice if you need to scan long documents – Legal or foolscap – or want to connect to two different computers at once. The scanners fall into two broad classes. A notch above expectation. All the scanners we tested produce decent output, but three stand out from the pack.
|Date Added:||6 December 2012|
|File Size:||67.37 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A solid 2-in-1 detachable with excellent connectivity.
Microtek ScanMaker X12USL (business edition) Overview – CNET
Both Hewlett-Packard oabs were fuzzy in the red channel, producing some red color-fringing along the edge of the knife blade — a more difficult condition to correct than overall softness. Microtek’s X12USL is a good choice if you need to scan long documents – Legal or foolscap – or want to connect to two different computers at once.
mocrotek Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme review: Where sharpness is concerned, not all 1,ppi scanners are created equal. You agree to receive updates, alerts and promotions from CBS and that CBS may share information about you with our marketing partners so that they may contact you by email or otherwise about their products or services. Eight of the scanners capture 1, pixels per inch ppiwhile the ninth, the Epson America Inc.
My Profile Log Out. The scanners fall into two broad classes.
The price is good for such a flexible device. The Epson and Microtek scanners embed the scanner profile in the image, a better approach if you use color-managed applications that recognize embedded profiles. Perfection SU, boasts the highest resolution in its class at 1, ppi.
The Hewlett-Packard models, which lack color-management features, produced oversaturated scans with a pronounced red cast.
All the scanners capture at least 36 bits per pixel internally, and most capture 42, but only the Umax and Microtek scanners let you save all those bits on microyek. All the scanners we tested produce decent output, but three stand out from the pack.
Colour reproduction is much better, with natural flesh tones and well-balanced vivid colours that were acceptably close to their originals. This may be a useful bonus if you’re buying the scanner for use in a small workgroup. ScanWizard is a dual-view application, which you can use in its simple mode with automatic settings for all the major parameters. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 8. One is intended for general office use, offering quick and convenient ways to scan to e-mail, the Web, faxes, an OCR optical character recognition application, or an image editor, via programmable buttons on the scanner.
The control is hidden away in one of the Advanced view menu options. But technology sometimes progresses much faster than we expect, and flatbed scanners are a case in point. A waterproof, rugged walkie-talkie phone. Scanners that do use ColorSync implement it in different ways: We also found it difficult to select a scanning area of 8. However, it uses a slightly fiddly four-window display rather than integrating everything into a single pane. Three of the scanners — the SnapScan e50, the ScanJet c, and the ScanMaker — include a transparency adapter for scanning 35mm slides and negatives, but we were much less impressed by these scans.
If you prefer to take more control, the Advanced view exposes much more functionality. Its bed is mm long — enough to accommodate US Legal-sized paper. The most immediately noticeable aspect of this scanner is its length.
Microtek ScanMaker X12USL Pro
But a few of the models we tested do so with almost no intervention, thanks to Apple Computer Inc. In the Pro version of the ScanMaker X12USL, reviewed here, a transparency adapter is built into the lavs, so it can cope with photographic originals as well as printed ones.
ScanJet c and c, and the Microtek ScanMaker all fall into this class. In fact, the Epson lagged behind the others in terms of sharpness and displayed some color-fringing along high-contrast edges in this case, due to misregistration between the three color channels — about two pixels at 1, ppi.
The Agfa scans were so sharp, we suspect the scanner applies some sharpening automatically; they were also noisier than the others, reinforcing that theory.